case legislation Case regulation is law that is based on judicial decisions instead than legislation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case regulation concerns exclusive disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common legislation , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions on a particular issue or topic.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In that perception, case regulation differs from one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in New York would not be decided using case legislation from California. In its place, New York courts will evaluate the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions about the issue exist, New York courts might have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority somewhat than binding authority. Other factors for example how previous the decision is and also the closeness into the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common legislation.
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only finished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is recognized along with the employee is found guilty after due process of legislation, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct will not be satisfactory nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful fashion. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
When you find an error from the written content of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is really a law that is based on precedents, that would be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Article 27 in the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment more info in addition. The disparity from the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the distinct negation in the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times to the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a poor link or even a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Centre.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage will not be in depth, but this is a wonderful starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.